BLACKLOCK’S BOMBSHELL SCOOP: Trudeau knew about vaccine deaths, was advised to keep quiet:  Cabinet Memo

The Trudeau government knew vaccines were injuring and killing people, but were told to keep quiet.

The Canadian prime minister was advised to downplay injuries and deaths related to the Covid vaccines, as was reported by Blacklock’s Reporter.

The bombshell scoop was covered by the Toronto Sun:

A secret Privy Council office memo recommended that any COVID vaccine-related injuries or deaths be carefully managed with “winning communication strategies” as to not “shake public confidence.”  … 
 
The memo also suggested skewing stats to minimize the impact of vaccine-related deaths or injuries, such as stating the “chance of it happening to me is one in a million” rather than “it has happened five times.”

Source above: Toronto 99

Source below:  Toronto Sun

---

Privy Council advocated downplaying COVID vaccine injuries or deaths

Postmedia News
Published Jun 06, 2023 • Last updated Jun 06, 2023 • 1 minute read

PHOTO: Ryan Dutton, an EMT from Rescue Inc., prepares shots of the Pfizer COVID-19 booster vaccine during a clinic held at Leland and Gray Middle and High School, in Townshend, Vt., Sept. 20, 2022. Photo by Kristopher Radder /THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

A secret Privy Council office memo recommended that any COVID vaccine-related injuries or deaths be carefully managed with “winning communication strategies” as to not “shake public confidence,” according to Blacklock’s Reporter.

---

When you combine this KNOWLEDGE of mass deaths and injuries with TOTAL ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE for a pandemic, which the “governments” would not (could not) produce in court when asked i.e., by counsel from the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, and when you combine all of that with the analyses by Denis Rancourt and his team proving that there was NO pandemic, and the government stats on alleged “Covid-19” deaths were not rational, you have mass murder.  Deliberate aggravated assault. That’s just for the poison shots.

There is also the criminal charge of TORTURE from lockdowns, isolation, masking, school closures, spontaneous abortions caused by the injections, loss of home-job-business, drug overdoses, domestic violence, torture of the elderly dying isolated and alone, the torture of their families denied the right to see them; the torture of young children unable to see facial features of parents and school-mates; and on and on, all of that is TORTURE by government officials who covertly decided to “skew the stats” to hide the mass deaths and injuries while shutting down the economy to destroy private property and personal rights, and using POLICE to enforce and further assault the victims, with ZERO PROOF of a pandemic ever offered.

Everyone who lost their home, job, business, loved one, child, any other property, or the opportunity to exercise their God-given rights in this country and elsewhere on Earth, has a criminal and civil case against the entire Privy Council who colluded in this MONSTROUS PLAN TO MASS MURDER and CRIMINALLY ASSAULT CANADIANS but “skew the stats” to cover it up.  People who were KILLED deliberately in “care” facilities based on FAKE “diagnoses” of a disease they could not possibly have had, can be avenged by relatives who can bring criminal charges of HOMICIDE and sue for civil DAMAGES.

The May 2021 memo released through access-to-Information legislation came five months after the Department of Health licensed the first Pfizer-BioNTech pandemic vaccine.

“Events related to a COVID-19 vaccine may be minor or severe,” said the memo called “Testing Behaviourally-Informed Messaging In Response To Severe Adverse Events Following Immunization.”

“News reports of adverse events following immunization and the government’s response to them have strong potential to influence public confidence in vaccines and their safety.”

The memo also suggested skewing stats to minimize the impact of vaccine-related deaths or injuries, such as stating the “chance of it happening to me is one in a million” rather than “it has happened five times.”

The Public Health Agency said of the 97.6 million vaccine doses administered at the time of the report, there were 20,428 “serious adverse event reports.”

The reports included laboured breathing and heart attacks (55 reports), kidney damage (78), spontaneous abortions (87), facial paralysis (187), strokes (281), deaths (427), blood clots (848) and incidents of heart inflammation (1,153).

A federal compensation fund to date has paid out millions on injury and death claims.

“Of the 427 death reports, it was not possible to assess causality for 112 reports due to missing information,” said the agency in a statement.

A separate $75 million Vaccine Injury Support Program received 1,299 claims due to vaccine-related deaths and injuries with a total 50 claims paid to date, totalling nearly $2.8 million.

---

EVERY MEMBER OF
THE PRIVY COUNCIL
SHOULD BE ARRESTED
AND CRIMINALLY CHARGED

GOVERNMENT IS NOT ABOVE THE LAW. They are just as guilty of any criminal act or omission as any ordinary citizen. That is basic law of this country, inherited from the British Constitution when Confederation came into force in 1867.

Here’s how the “Rule of Law” works. First, note that the terms “rule of law” and “Rule of Law” with caps are different. We are talking about “Rule of Law” with caps. The expert scholar on the Rule of Law in the British tradition was Albert Venn Dicey. Download his Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution and search for “Rule of Law”.

Download Dicey: https://oll.libertyfund.org/title/michener-introduction-to-the-study-of-the-law-of-the-constitution-lf-ed

DELIBERATE CONCEALMENT of the deadly consequences of the injections (forced onto Canadians by federal and provincial mandates) while LYING that they are “safe and effective” and deliberately hiding the deaths and injuries while continuing to COERCE Canadians to ACCEPT the injections is a CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY to ASSAULT AND KILL innocent Canadians. It is mass murder and genocide. The a “secret memo” advocating covering up the deaths and injuries from the vaxx roll-out is evidence of conspiracy to inflict GENOCIDE upon a part of the Canadian population, and DISABLING INJURY for another part of the Canadian population.

The “Rule of Law” has always been known to the law of Canada and was made famous in the case of Roncarelli v. Duplessis, when a restaurant owner sued Quebec Premier Maurice Duplessis for cancelling his liquor license on the arbitrary ground that he was a Jehohva’s Witness and was using his money to LAWFULLY secure bail for other Witnesses who were charged with alleged offences. The case stands for the FACT that the GOVERNMENT IS NOT ABOVE THE LAW, and that using the law as a COVER to achieve PERSONAL objectives (such as harassment of a religious group) is ILLEGAL. In the case of Roncarelli, it was a civil offence.I

In the current situation of the SECRET CABINET MEMO it is clearly a CRIMINAL OFFENCE designed to deceive innocent Canadians into accepting deadly injections KNOWN to kill and seriously injure the recipients.
https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/2751/index.do

There are additional facts underlining the long-term damage caused by these shots, including radically shortened life-span, cognitive (intellectual) disability, spontaneous abortion, male and female infertility, turbo cancers, and other serious illnesses. THIS IS CRIMINAL ASSAULT AND MASS MURDER by the TRUDEAU CABINET AND THE PRIVY COUNCIL. They must ALL be charged accordingly. They are NOT above the LAW.

---

Pandemic Unmasked: Scientist Denis Rancourt Exposes the Deception Behind Government Measures

Denis Rancourt is an accomplished interdisciplinary Canadian scientist and physicist, and a former tenured Full Professor of physics and lead scientist, originally at the University of Ottawa.

Rancourt conducted extensive scientific studies resulting in the following conclusions:

1. If there had been no pandemic propaganda or coercion, and governments and the medical establishment had simply gone on with business as usual, then there would not have been any excess mortality

2. There was no pandemic-causing excess mortality

3. Measures caused excess mortality

4. COVID-19 vaccination caused excess mortality

Download the Essay (2023-06-22) by Denis G. Rancourt, PhD, “There Was No Pandemic,” and his web site and links at Archive Today:  https://archive.ph/ao3wz

We could add to that, “Measures caused deliberate economic destruction“.

Denis Renacourt in the interview above refers to certain “hot spots” where there actually was excess mortality.

However, it should be remembered that excess mortality in the so-called “hot spots” had more to do, i.e., in the case of UK where it’s provable, with a deliberate government policy to exterminate the elderly with Midazolam and Morphine, that were acquired in massive quantities for the job. Look for Michael O’Bernicia re the “Midazolam Murders“, who led the battle on that front in the corrupt English courts.

In other “hot spots” like New York City, and Quebec, the excess mortality was driven by removing ill elderly patients from hospitals and dumping them en masse into crowded “care” facilities, where sometimes (as with instances in Canada) the staff fled in terror and failed to show up for work. The elderly were found abandoned in their beds without food and without a change of their underclothes.

Additional deaths were undoubtedly caused by denying important surgical and medical treatments to the seriously ill in order to keep hospital beds empty for the falsely alleged “millions” of Covid-19 deaths that were expected to arrive, and thus avoid “contagious” contact with medical teams.  But, of course, there was no deadly pathogen, there was no pandemic, and the seriously ill no doubt died without the care they required.

In other “hot spots” like Quebec, anyone over a certain age who was mis-diagnosed with the fake PCR test was deliberately “euthanized” (murdered) instead of being treated, as reported by the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition:
https://thereisnopandemic.net/2021/11/26/euthanasia-prevention-coalition-there-has-been-a-massacre-of-the-elderly-in-quebec-by-euthanasia-on-pretext-of-covid-19-19-november-2021/

It should also be recalled that hospitals, notably in the United States, were financially incentivized to mis-diagnose Covid-19 and then to isolate and intubate their victims on lung machines (known to cause death) while also administering deadly drugs like Remdesivir which causes kidney failure.  (Apparently, there was a brisk business in human organ harvesting in tandem with these “measures”.)

Rancourt is a member of the Ontario Civil Liberties Association which summarized his evidence to the National Citizens’ Inquiry here.

RAIR FOUNDATION REPORTED ON DENIS RANCOURT’S SCIENTIFIC STUDY HERE.

---

Since when can a mass murderer and serial assailant PAY OFF HIS VICTIM, and moreover, use TAXPAYER DOLLARS to do it

The deliberate tactic of skewing the stats to minimize the impact (deny public knowledge of the deadly effects) of VAXX DEATHS and INJURIES would undoubtedly include skewing the alleged “Covid death” stats.

But that came first, even before the vaxx roll-out.  It came with government orders to falsify death certificates as “Covid-19” deaths, and avoid doing autopsies, clearly so the truth that they were no “Covid-19” deaths would not come out.

It came along with misrepresenting deaths of elderly persons in “care” homes as Covid-19 deaths, when in fact they were “Midazolam Murders” passed off as death by virus.

There should be maximum consecutive sentences.  No mercy.  Their victims had no mercy and were murdered for profit and to kick-start the roll toward intensive centralization for World Government on the pretext of a non-existent pandemic.  Deliberate mass murder on a global scale to take power away from nations and concentrate it in the hands of murderers.  The cabinet should be permanently barred from running for office, any office, at any level.

There should be a couple of sets of law suits.  One to bring criminal charges against the Trudeau cabinet, and against every government official who went along with this orchestrated mass murder for profit and mass destruction of rights and property for the PANDEMIC LIE.  And there should be another set of law suits for DAMAGES against the culprits, with the damages to come out of THE KILLERS’ POCKETS.

Here’s an example of some Criminal Code provisions in Canada that criminal lawyers today should be looking into.

HOMICIDE
Criminal Code of Canada

318 (1) Every person who advocates or promotes genocide is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years.

That cabinet memo advocated and promoted genocide any laid out the tactics to achieve it by HIDING it from the public thus ensuring that more people would be killed or injured.

Homicide

222 (1) A person commits homicide when, directly or indirectly, by any means, he causes the death of a human being.
Marginal note:Kinds of homicide

(2) Homicide is culpable or not culpable.
Marginal note:Non culpable homicide

(3) Homicide that is not culpable is not an offence.
Marginal note:Culpable homicide

(4) Culpable homicide is murder or manslaughter or infanticide.
Marginal note:Idem

(5) A person commits culpable homicide when he causes the death of a human being,

[…]

Marginal note:Exception

(6) Notwithstanding anything in this section, a person does not commit homicide within the meaning of this Act by reason only that he causes the death of a human being by procuring, by false evidence, the conviction and death of that human being by sentence of the law.

[…]

Murder reduced to manslaughter

232 (1) Culpable homicide that otherwise would be murder may be reduced to manslaughter if the person who committed it did so in the heat of passion caused by sudden provocation.

[…]

Marginal note:Death during illegal arrest

(4) Culpable homicide that otherwise would be murder is not necessarily manslaughter by reason only that it was committed by a person who was being arrested illegally, but the fact that the illegality of the arrest was known to the accused may be evidence of provocation for the purpose of this section.

[…]

270.01 (1) Everyone commits an offence who, in committing an assault referred to in section 270, (a) carries, uses or threatens to use a weapon or an imitation of one; or. (b) causes bodily harm to the complainant.

RESEARCH NEEDED: SHOULD INCLUDE AIRLINE PILOTS

Unlawfully causing bodily harm

269 Every one who unlawfully causes bodily harm to any person is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 269 1994, c. 44, s. 182019, c. 25, s. 94

Previous Version

Marginal note:Aggravating circumstance — assault against a public transit operator

269.01 (1) When a court imposes a sentence for an offence referred to in paragraph 264.1(1)(a) or any of sections 266 to 269, it shall consider as an aggravating circumstance the fact that the victim of the offence was, at the time of the commission of the offence, a public transit operator engaged in the performance of his or her duty.

Marginal note:Definitions

(2) The following definitions apply in this section.

public transit operator means an individual who operates a vehicle used in the provision of passenger transportation services to the public, and includes an individual who operates a school bus. (conducteur de véhicule de transport en commun)

vehicle includes a bus, paratransit vehicle, licensed taxi cab, train, subway, tram and ferry. (véhicule)

= = =

Torture

269.1 (1) Every official, or every person acting at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of an official, who inflicts torture on any other person is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

Marginal note:Definitions

(2) For the purposes of this section,

official means

(a) a peace officer,

(b) a public officer,

(c) a member of the Canadian Forces, or

(d) any person who may exercise powers, pursuant to a law in force in a foreign state, that would, in Canada, be exercised by a person referred to in paragraph (a), (b), or (c),

whether the person exercises powers in Canada or outside Canada; (fonctionnaire)

torture means any act or omission by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person

(a) for a purpose including

(i) obtaining from the person or from a third person information or a statement,

(ii) punishing the person for an act that the person or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, and

(iii) intimidating or coercing the person or a third person, or

(b) for any reason based on discrimination of any kind,

but does not include any act or omission arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions. (torture)

Marginal note:No defence

(3) It is no defence to a charge under this section that the accused was ordered by a superior or a public authority to perform the act or omission that forms the subject-matter of the charge or that the act or omission is alleged to have been justified by exceptional circumstances, including a state of war, a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency.

Marginal note:Evidence

(4) In any proceedings over which Parliament has jurisdiction, any statement obtained as a result of the commission of an offence under this section is inadmissible in evidence, except as evidence that the statement was so obtained.

R.S., 1985, c. 10 (3rd Supp.), s. 2

= = =

Source:  https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-45.9/page-1.html

Offences Within Canada

Marginal note:  Genocide, etc., committed in Canada

4 (1) Every person is guilty of an indictable offence who commits

(a) genocide;

(b) a crime against humanity; or

(c) a war crime.

Marginal note:Conspiracy, attempt, etc.

(1.1) Every person who conspires or attempts to commit, is an accessory after the fact in relation to, or counsels in relation to, an offence referred to in subsection (1) is guilty of an indictable offence.

Marginal note:  Punishment

(2) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1) or (1.1)

(a) shall be sentenced to imprisonment for life, if an intentional killing forms the basis of the offence; and

(b) is liable to imprisonment for life, in any other case.

Marginal note:Definitions

(3) The definitions in this subsection apply in this section.

crime against humanity means murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, imprisonment, torture, sexual violence, persecution or any other inhumane act or omission that is committed against any civilian population or any identifiable group and that, at the time and in the place of its commission, constitutes a crime against humanity according to customary international law or conventional international law or by virtue of its being criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations, whether or not it constitutes a contravention of the law in force at the time and in the place of its commission. (crime contre l’humanité)

genocide means an act or omission committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, an identifiable group of persons, as such, that, at the time and in the place of its commission, constitutes genocide according to customary international law or conventional international law or by virtue of its being criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations, whether or not it constitutes a contravention of the law in force at the time and in the place of its commission. (génocide)

WHERE ARE THE LAWYERS?